No hard details nonetheless, though opponents of net neutrality only scored a big victory — the US Court of Appeals for a District of Columbia has sided with Comcast as well as ruled that a FCC doesn’t have a management underneath stream law to levy regulations on internet service providers. Patently we’re super interested in the wonky minutae, so we’ll be digging for them — stay tuned.

Update: Fine, we’re reading the perspective (PDF below) as well as basically it boils down similarto this: the FCC ordered Comcast to stop filtering Bittorrent on the network in early 2008, and Comcast filed suit, observant a FCC didn’t have a authority to intervene similarto which. Since there’s no specific law giving the FCC a management to regulate the in ternet, a FCC told a court it was regulating its “ancillary powers,” that concede the group to take actions indispensable to fulfill the role — as well as a FCC was interpreting the role as compelling net neutrality formed on a process statements of Association. The court pronounced which wasn’t good sufficient, patently — we’d bet this gets appealed rughtaway while Congress goes to work upon a specific law sanctioning the Commission to impose net neutrality.